- 122,209 downloads
- stumble
- 10,260 users sharing 787 files, 250 videos, 43 quizzes and 24 ideas
- Register
- Login
This idea is from Stef_C's mind and was lovingly penned on 22 August 2009.
I hate to do this, I felt so clever when I thought of it! I am starting A2 with psychology of sport. I have a plenary task that I love. Pretend you are a barrister and use trait and/or interactionist theories to defend the Harlequin 'vampires'. Then be a prosecuting barrister and refute all of the arguments. This should enable them to evaluate the theories. What do you all think?
Tags
| On 6 April 2010 jbreen (PM) wrote: I dont teach the A2 model but a senior course in another country. I do something similar, but use a letter to the editor type approach. They have to write both sides of the arguement. It works well and shows good understanding. I do if for a sociological incident in sport | |
![]() |
On 9 April 2010 Stef_C (PM) wrote: Oooh! I'll pass that on to the NQT who teaches the sociology bits. I'll definitely add it to revision sessions. These will enable us to stay up to date with current sporting happenings each year, which always seems to help! Thanks. |
You must be logged in before you can comment.